Tax Fairness: President Trump, A Case Study

Tax Fairness: President Trump, A Case Study

Yesterday, I testified before the Ways and Means Subcommittee on Oversight on “tax fairness,” and the hearing spotlighted the reporting of new detai

How Income Taxes Interact With Racial Disparities
Where Is My Refund? | Tax Policy Center
How Can We Increase EITC Participation?


Yesterday, I testified before the Ways and Means Subcommittee on Oversight on “tax fairness,” and the hearing spotlighted the reporting of new details on President Trump’s income taxes by The New York Times. The recent Times report filled out a picture of  Trump’s returns that began to emerge in earlier articles.

This picture calls into question the president’s returns in three respects: (1) the fairness of the amount of income taxes he reportedly paid, (2) the fairness of his reported business losses, and (3) the fairness of the IRS audit of his income taxes.

First, I believe the $750 of income tax reportedly paid by the president in 2017 was not fair. For instance, $750 is lower than the income tax paid by the average taxpayer in every income group that we might use to compare. It even is lower than what 90 percent of middle-income households paid that year, and lower than what 99.6 percent of millionaires—a group in which Trump puts himself—paid.

 Perhaps Trump’s 2017 tax return represented a businessman who had a bad year. But, according to The Times, he paid little or no income taxes for many, many years.

Second, The Times reported that Trump’s businesses routinely had large expenses and losses, which would only be fair if the expenses were genuine—and accurate. I have raised questions about his large tax losses in the past. But we can’t tell if the…



Click here for the full story.

COMMENTS

WORDPRESS: 0
DISQUS: